Schedule a consultation today

At What Age Can a Child Refuse to See a Parent in Colorado?

at what age can a child refuse to see a parent

Key Takeaways

  • Colorado law sets no specific age at which a child can legally refuse court-ordered parenting time.
  • Courts consider a child’s maturity, actual preference, and how much weight it deserves before making decisions.
  • A child’s preference is one factor among many and never automatically dictates a parenting time outcome.
  • A parent’s non-compliance can look willful, though courts recognize control over a child changes with age.
  • Repeated refusal can lead to a court motion, mediation, makeup parenting time, or contempt penalties.

One of the most common sources of confusion in Colorado custody cases: “At what age can a child refuse to see a parent?” Parents want a specific number that resolves the issue, but Colorado law does not provide one. Colorado sets no specific age at which a child can unilaterally refuse parenting time, and a court-ordered parenting plan remains legally binding until a judge changes it, regardless of how strongly a child resists or how old the child is. At Hogan Omidi, P.C., our Denver child custody lawyers help parents understand what actually changes as a child gets older and how to handle these situations without putting the existing order at risk.

Contact a Child Custody Lawyer in Denver

Colorado Law: There Is No Set “Magic Age”

Many parents come to us already convinced that there is a specific age when a child’s opinion suddenly impacts a parenting time agreement. This belief is common, but it is not accurate under Colorado law. The honest answer to the question “At what age can a child refuse to see a parent?” is that there is no such age. C.R.S. § 14-10-124 does not set an age at which a child gains the right to refuse time with a parent.

Instead, a court considers each child individually and asks three things: whether the child is mature enough to form a genuine, independent opinion rather than one repeated from a parent, what the opinion actually is, and how much it should matter given all other details in the case. A twelve-year-old in one family may reason more independently than a sixteen-year-old in another, so the court considers the individual child, not simply an age on paper.

How a Child’s Preference Is Weighed by the Court

Establishing that a child is mature enough to have an opinion is only the first step. Colorado Family Law and Practice explains that the court’s full evaluation unfolds in a set order that is quite formal. The court first decides whether a child is mature enough to express a reasoned, independent preference, since a young child repeating a line coached by one parent is nothing like a teenager articulating genuine reasons of their own, for instance. Once that determination is made, the court identifies the preference and decides how much weight it carries, though a child’s wishes never automatically dictate the outcome.

FACTOR WHAT COLORADO COURTS MAY CONSIDER
Child’s Maturity Whether the child can express a reasoned, independent preference
Child’s Stated Wishes The child’s expressed preference and how much weight it carries
Family Relationships The child’s relationships with parents, siblings, and other significant people
Stability The child’s adjustment to home, school, and community
Parental Support Each parent’s willingness to encourage the child’s relationship with the other parent

If a Child and Family Investigator, or CFI, has been appointed, the investigator must include the child’s expressed wishes in a written report and offer recommendations aimed at the child’s best interests. A judge may also interview a child privately in chambers, though this step is discretionary, and the judge must explain and document the reasoning.

A child’s preference, though important, is only one factor among many others.

The Best Interests of the Child Standard

Weighing a child’s preference is part of a broader test that Colorado courts apply to every parenting time decision: the best interests of the child standard. Under the same statute, courts weigh several factors together, including the following:

  • The wishes of each parent
  • The child’s relationships with parents, siblings, and other significant people
  • The child’s adjustment to home, school, and community
  • Each parent’s willingness to encourage the child’s relationship with the other parent

No single factor, including the child’s own wishes, is treated as definitively more important than the others. As outlined in Colorado Family Law and Practice, courts weigh the statutory factors together rather than applying a fixed hierarchy. A parent who assumes a teenager’s preference alone will settle a case misunderstands the legal context. This is a type of situation that can become costly if the child stops showing up for parenting time altogether.

Speak With a Denver Child Custody Lawyer

Schedule a Confidential Consultation

What Happens If a Child Refuses Parenting Time?

Once a child refuses, a parent cannot simply step back and blame the child. Colorado courts generally expect a parent to use reasonable encouragement or firmer parental authority in these circumstances. Doing nothing can look like willful non-compliance with the order. As Colorado Family Law and Practice notes, this defense becomes harder to evaluate when a child is the one refusing, and it tends to hold up better as the child gets older, since a parent’s realistic control over a seven-year-old is typically much different from their control over a seventeen-year-old.

When visits break down repeatedly, the other parent can file a verified motion under C.R.S. § 14-10-129.5. The court must act within thirty days and generally has three options:

  • Deny the motion if unsupported
  • Order mediation and require a report on the results
  • Set the matter for a hearing

Remedies can include:

  • Makeup parenting time equal to what was missed
  • A compliance bond
  • In serious cases, a contempt finding with a fine or jail time

A single missed visit rarely triggers these consequences, but a pattern can put both parents and the existing order at real risk.

Addressing a Child’s Refusal to See a Parent

Addressing a child’s refusal effectively requires more than waiting to see how a court might rule. Keeping factual, unemotional documentation of missed parenting time helps demonstrate a genuine pattern rather than a single bad day. Additionally, avoiding disparaging remarks about the other parent in front of the child matters just as much, since courts view that behavior unfavorably, no matter who started the conflict. If resistance from the child continues, the underlying order itself may need to change rather than being enforced again and again. This calls for a formal modification request rather than an informal agreement between the parents.

Because the right approach depends heavily on the specific family and the history behind the child’s resistance, guidance from a Denver child custody lawyer at this stage can prevent a difficult situation from becoming a legal liability.

Get Help from a Denver Child Custody Lawyer Today

A child pushing back on parenting time will not resolve on its own. Wondering at what age a child can refuse to see a parent will not change the terms of an existing order, but a clear legal strategy can. Hogan Omidi, P.C., works with Denver parents to document parenting time concerns, pursue enforcement when it is warranted, and request modifications when a child’s circumstances have genuinely changed. Call (303) 691-9600 today to schedule a confidential consultation.

HOGAN OMIDI, PC

COLORADO FAMILY LAW ATTORNEYS

At Hogan Omidi, PC, we take a deliberate approach that emphasizes civility and practical solutions over conflict and gamesmanship. We help clients think “big picture” and long term to identify what is truly important. Once you view the situation with proper perspective and clear priorities, the process becomes less stressful and more conducive to creative and sensible resolutions.”

fact-checked-icon

This page has been written, edited, and reviewed by a team of legal writers following our comprehensive editorial guidelines. This page was approved by Founding Equity Partner Kathleen Ann Hogan, who has more than 20 years of legal experience as a Family Law Attorney in Colorado.